Discover the most popular and inspiring quotes and sayings on the topic of Debated. Share them with your friends on social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or your personal blogs, and let the world be inspired by their powerful messages. Here are the Top 100 Debated Quotes And Sayings by 99 Authors including Gina Mccarthy,Hillary Clinton,Joyce Appleby,Richard Whately,Dee Dee M. Scott for you to enjoy and share.
Even if there's controversy, I'm going to make the decision, and people are going to be happy in one instance and unhappy in the next. But that's the job I've been given and the job I'm going to embrace.
We're always going to argue about abortion. It's a hard choice and it's controversial, and that's why I'm pro-choice, because I want people to make their own choices.
Contention is inseparable from creating knowledge. It is not contention we should try to avoid, but discourses that attempt to suppress contention.
Controversy, though always an evil in itself, is sometimes a necessary evil.
Never debate, just tell the truth. You will win everytime.
I'm an academic. I'm hardwired for a good debate.
A brilliant and challenging discussion presented with extraordinary clarity.
I never listen to debates. They are dreadful things indeed. The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides. On all known subjects, ranging from aviation to xylophone-playing, I have fixed and invariable ideas. They have not changed since I was four or five.
Defining the terms of the debate generally dictates who's gonna' win it.
We will not put a lid on opinions. On the contrary, it is more important than ever that political debates are open and free, even on the most difficult issues. Especially on the most difficult issues. The task is to encourage controversial debates in a form that strengthens democracy.
The only debatable issue, it seems to me, is whether it is more ridiculous to turn to experts in social theory for general well-confirmed propositions, or to the specialists in the great religions and philosophical systems for insights into fundamental human values.
There is no debate here, just scientists and non-scientists. And since the subject is science, the non-scientists don't get a vote.
The dinner table is a lively debate, and everybody weighs in in a different way. I like that, though.
I've never seen, heard, nor smelled an issue that was so dangerous it couldn't be talked about. Hell yes, I'm for debating anything!
A debate actually is a policy issue but I will say this - gosh, if you guys ask one more mean question, I may have to leave the stage.
Arguing is a game that two can play at. But it is a strange game in that neither opponent ever wins.
Everyone wants to argue. Everyone does. Everyone needs to.
Where there are so many, all speech becomes a debate without end. But two together may perhaps find wisdom.
Having a debate right now over whether or not to legalize marijuana is kind of like having a debate over whether the sun will come up tomorrow.
Who wins at the end of the day? The self-satisfied people who heatedly debate some obscure details? Or the people who sidestep the entire debate and get started?
There's always going to be controversy when you write the way I write.
For in meditation, debate has no place.
A problem that presents itself as a dilemma carries an unfortunate prescription: to argue instead of act.
As soon as one point is removed from the sphere of dogmatic certainty, the discussion may not simply result in a new and better formulation, but may easily lead to endless debates and general confusion.
Questions are the heart and soul of constructive conflict. They open up the exploration, bring in new information, and reframe debate. When
I don't like controversy.
We live in a hell of opinions.
I'm not a debater. I get things done.
It is not surprising that honest and well-informed experts can disagree about facts. But beyond the disagreement about facts, there is another deeper disagreement about values.
Arguing is the Olympics of talking
Decentralisation is controversial - but that's fine. We should be fearless about having a debate.
The tension between 'yes' and 'no', between 'I can' and 'I cannot', makes us feel that, in so many instances, human life is an interminable debate with one's self.
People argue themselves out of their pleasures
Doubtless there are times when controversy becomes a necessary evil. But let us remember that it is an evil.
Opinions differ most when there is least scientific warrant for having any.
The passionate controversies of one era are viewed as sterile preoccupations by another, for knowledge alters what we seek as well as what we find.
There are as many opinions as there are experts.
Scholars will argue with each other about everything.
Some matters are simply contentious. Sometimes you're never going to get it right.
In general, a little controversy isn't harmful: if anything, it gets people interested.
Good conversational debate is an end in itself, and talking for the love of conversation is what makes us human.
It's funny when people debate about music, because they get so passionate about what they enjoy.
I enjoyed debate on the floor but it's not really debate in the same way.
I am used to controversies.
Discussion in America means dissent.
If we're going to have debates, let's have real debates.
I think of fans like a barbershop. I want that debate.
Controversy is what mediocre people start because they can't communicate anything meaningful.
When deliberating, think in campaigns and not battles; in wars and not
campaigns; in ultimate conquest and not wars.
To venture an opinion is like moving a piece at chess: it may be taken, but it forms the beginning of a game that is won.
If you don't accept there is a problem, then it is hard to debate things.
One of the greatest values of controversy is its revealing nature. The real issues at stake come into the open and have the possibility of being reconciled.
In every debate, whatever the format, whatever the questions, there is one and only one way to identify the winner: Who commands the room? Who drives the narrative? Who is in charge?
Arguments over grammar and style are often as fierce as those over IBM versus Mac, and as fruitless as Coke versus Pepsi and boxers versus briefs.
Whatever the field under discussion, those who engage in debate must not only believe in each other's good faith, but also in their capacity to arrive at the truth.
I like controversy. The more controversial it gets, the more interesting it is.
I will not waste it arguing about the merits of this short story or that poem. Why would I, when all such opinions are subjective, and no final resolution can ever be reached?" Some
I happen to like debating, and I like to debate like a lawyer, and I can argue any points to death, and I will.
The purpose of debates is to explore issues, not end them.
The idea that everyone's opinion is valuable is sometimes up for question.
From the outset, however, this whole controversy has been plagued by tacit assumptions, very often of a philosophical rather than a physical character ...
Never argue. To win an argument is to lose a sale.
There is no shortage of disputes.
The curse of modern times is, that almost everything does create controversy.
There are always a lot of leading questions and opinions. Of course, our work is creative, and it's subjective.
Debate is an attempt to cling to the illusion of control provided by a point of view designed to keep the ego in place; dialogue is an attempt to dance with the unknown at the risk of losing what we think we know.
I only debate my equals. All others I teach.
I only debate with serious political youth formations. Not a group of the racist Helen Zille's garden boys.
I don't get debate agains guns at all. Because we have it after every mass shooting. And now a terror attack. And the proposals that are talked about almost always have nothing to do with this specific event.
Profound insights arise only in debate, with a possibility of counterargument, only when there is a possibility of expressing not only correct ideas but also dubious ideas.
You fight to win; you argue to achieve agreement.
Controversy for the sake of controversy is sin. Controversy for the sake of truth is a divine command.
Those who are right do not argue. Those who argue are not right.
Well I think people think sex is controversial. Not always, but certainly it's something to be discussed.
Literature is disputed territory.
Economics has many substantive areas of knowledge where there is agreement, but also contains areas of controversy. That's inescapable.
Political debate is political debate and that's fine. That's healthy.
So if you're losing the debate, you change the conversation.
It may happen sometimes that a long debate becomes the cause of a longer friendship. Commonly, those who dispute with one another at last agree.
We pass our life in deliberation, and we die upon it.
You can disagree but do not fight.
Can one consider controversy without falling into it?
Arguing with somebody is never pleasant, but sometimes it is useful and necessary to do so.
Two things, well considered, would prevent many quarrels: first, to have it well ascertained whether we are not disputing about terms, rather than things; and, secondly, to examine whether that on which we differ is worth contending about.
But controversy is a teacher.
Disagreement may be the shortest cut between two minds.
Let's not argue about it, let's study it.
A discussion should be a genuine attempt to explore a subject rather than a battle between competing egos.
Deliberation and debate is the way you stir the soul of our democracy.
It might be plausibly maintained, that in almost every one of the leading controversies, past or present, in social philosophy, both sides were in the right in what they affirmed, though wrong in what they denied.
Sometimes, if you really don't know how you feel about a topic, reading how both sides argue it can help.
There is giant untapped potential in disagreement, especially if the disagreement is between two or more thoughtful people
argument before he was
Disagreement produces debate but dissent produces dissension.
Oh, there's going to be debate because you're dealing with the Bible and religion is supposed to be separate from state and that to me is already a conflict before it even hits the gay issue.
Try to find the merit in each other's arguments.
Difference in opinions has cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether the juice of a certain berry be blood or wine.
It's always fascinating - and sometimes a little disquieting - when two first-rate critics violently disagree.
If art is singular expression, then by nature, the best art is controversial. But when art stirs debate for reasons besides its artistic integrity, that's when things get bent.
Never argue with what is.Argue-- Tyler Perry