Discover the most popular and inspiring quotes and sayings on the topic of Robotic. Share them with your friends on social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or your personal blogs, and let the world be inspired by their powerful messages. Here are the Top 100 Robotic Quotes And Sayings by 77 Authors including Robert M. Lindner,Rodney Brooks,Nikola Tesla,Colin Angle,Deyth Banger for you to enjoy and share.
Schools vast factories for the manufacture of robots.
So robots are good at very simple things like cleaning the floor, like doing a repetitive task. Our robots have a little tiny bit of common sense. Our robots know that if they've got something in their hand and they drop it, it's gone. They shouldn't go and try and put it down.
In the twenty-first century, the robot will take the place which slave labor occupied in ancient civilization.
Building a robot that has legs and walks around is a very expensive proposition. Mother Nature has created many wonderful things, but one thing we do have that nature doesn't is the wheel, a continuous rotating joint, and tracks, so we need to make use of inventions to make things simpler.
We are robots aren't we??
Artificial intelligence is growing up fast, as are robots whose facial expressions can elicit empathy and make your mirror neurons quiver.
One of the great things about the Roomba robot vacuum cleaner, which my company iRobot designed, is that it's too cheap not to be autonomous.
Unfortunately robots capable of manufacturing robots do not exist. That would be the philosopher's stone, the squaring of the circle.
Are skilled in the techniques necessary to neutralize any rogue robot.
Hans Moravec's book Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind.
My dear Miss Glory, Robots are not people. They are mechanically more perfect than we are, they have an astounding intellectual capacity, but they have no soul.
It's going to be fun watching this robot start malfunctioning.
If popular culture has taught us anything, it is that someday mankind must face and destroy the growing robot menace.
After more than a decade as the editor of 'Wired' magazine, Chris Anderson started the company of his dreams - a robotics manufacturing company called 3D Robotics - to produce the autonomous flying vehicles coming out of DIY Drones.
The cyborg is now the ideal to which all our most advanced technology is tending.
Of course there are robots among us. There are also Magicians among us. I think we take turns playing each role, as a matter of fact. The Magician defines a reality-mesh and the robot lives in it. Grok?
When the robot mind is mastered, undisciplined thinking ceases and is replaced by awareness. Awareness can know love.
I see a film or a TV series or a play as being this machine. It sounds quite robotic, in its description, but it's basically a machine and you're just one of the cogs that goes in it. You're not the biggest one, and you're not the smallest one. Everyone's the same size.
We have to make machines understand what they're doing, or they won't be able to come back and say, 'Why did you do that?'
The way that the robotics market is going to grow, at least in the home, is that we'll have a number of different special purpose robots.
There are an endless number of things to discover about robotics. A lot of it is just too fantastic for people to believe.
We humans have a love-hate relationship with our technology. We love each new advance and we hate how fast our world is changing ... The robots really embody that love-hate relationship we have with technology.
Sometimes a technology is so awe-inspiring that the imagination runs away with it - often far, far away from reality. Robots are like that. A lot of big and ultimately unfulfilled promises were made in robotics early on, based on preliminary successes.
You just can't differentiate between a robot and the very best of humans.
We stand poised on the brink of becoming true cyborgs, of having inorganic features that are inseparable from our bodies, features that modify our abilities, desires, personalities and identities.
I find it difficult to converse with robots.....Don't be afraid to be an independent thinker.
If I had a robot friend, he or she would be electric.
As president, I believe that robotics can inspire young people to pursue science and engineering. And I also want to keep an eye on those robots in case they try anything.
machine learning is the general field that studies how complex mechanisms can be created without a designer.
I'm interested in machines that make you aware of the process of seeing and aware of what you do when you construct the world by looking. This is interesting in itself, but more as a broad-based metaphor for how we understand the world.
But this is not a book about robots. Rather, it is about how we are changed as technology offers us substitutes for connecting with each other face-to-face.
We are not thinking machines that feel; rather, we are feeling machines that think.
Until a job is outsourced or streamlined through an innovation, an employee is trained to operate robotically. This is what a brand is.
The effort of using machines to mimic the human mind has always struck me as rather silly. I would rather use them to mimic something better.
Kids love robots. They're this fanciful, cool thing.
The utility of the robot needs to come first. It's business model over technology.
People are fascinated by robots because they're machines that can mimic life.
A machine! I have become a machine! It has taken over my life. How ironic! In a world of freedom and independence, my entire life now depends on a machine!
Working out what it would take to program goodness into a robot shows not only how much machinery it takes to be good but how slippery the concept of goodness is to start with.
As long as your robot isn't programmed by like Dr. Evil, I think you're going to be fine.
Being a sci-fi geek myself and going to movies all my life, I came to the conclusion that there were really two camps of how robots have been designed. It's either the tin man, which is a human with metal skin, or it's an R2D2.
Machines are braver than art.
For a long time, I felt instinctively irritated - sometimes repelled - by scientific friends' automatic use of the word 'mechanism' for automatic bodily processes. A machine was man-made; it was not a sentient being; a man was not a machine.
Robots have gotten steadily more capable, but humans' expectations that robots should have minds keeps biting robot developers.
If you were to insist I was a robot, you might not consider me capable of love in some mystic human sense, but you would not be able to distinguish my reactions from that which you would call love so what difference would it make?
How do you make RoboCop? How do you slowly bring a guy to be a robot? How do you actually take humanity out of someone and how do you program a brain, so to speak, and how does that affect an individual?
Hollywood likes to imagine robots as mechanical copies of ourselves - which is a terrible idea.
Most robots don't program themselves.
By the late twentieth century, our time, a mythic time, we are all chimeras, theorized and fabricated hybrids of machine and organism; in short, we are cyborgs.
The great mystery is why robots come off so well in science-fiction films when the human characters are often so astoundingly wooden.
We aren't robots. What makes us exceptional as humans, is that we have the capacity to feel as many emotions all at once.
If we're going to achieve compassion in the machines and also feel safe with the machines, to raise machines with human-like values, we need to make them human-like by simulating, or perhaps eventually imitating, human beings in high accuracy from top to bottom.
It's not just the drive. They're right out front. Everywhere. Waiting for me. All day and night."
"Who are, dear?"
"Robots selling things. As soon as I set down the ship. Robots and visual-audio ads. They dig right into a man's brain. They follow people around until they die.
When it costs you the same amount of manufacturing effort to make advanced robotic parts as it does to manufacture a paperweight, that really changes things in a profound way.
The computer is the most extraordinary of man's technological clothing; it's an extension of our central nervous system. Beside it, the wheel is a mere hula-hoop.
Two big questions that people ask me are: if we make these robots more and more human-like, will we accept them - will they need rights eventually? And the other question people ask me is, will they want to take over?
We wanted to solve robot problems and needed some vision, action, reasoning, planning, and so forth. We even used some structural learning, such as was being explored by Patrick Winston.
Building intelligent machines can teach us about our minds - about who we are - and those lessons will make our world a better place. To win that knowledge, though, our species will have to trade in another piece of its vanity.
There's something so arrogant about us creating robots that are more and more human-looking or acting. It's like we're playing God. Let's create something that's a reflection of us, but it's inferior.
Playing a robot is possibly the most difficult role you can have as an actor, because you have to take all your innate emotional responses and completely suppress them. Even the way you walk is affected.
I'm Dr. David Hanson, and I build robots with character. And by that, I mean that I develop robots that are characters, but also robots that will eventually come to empathize with you.
A robot-arm in a factory doesn't decide minute by minute whether to rivet or revolt - it just does the job is has literally been trained to do. It's if and when we build a conscious robot that we may have to worry.
You have a very precisely defined goal and you build a machine that's superhuman in its capabilities for achieving goals. If it turns out that the subsequent behavior of the robot in achieving that goal was not what you want, you have a real problem.
Unfortunately, real life doesn't have a remote control.
Well, robots are, of course, the monkey's natural enemy.
When I look out in the future, I can't imagine a world, 500 years from now, where we don't have robots everywhere.
Its agents -- not even
human equivalent on this primitive hardware -- raced through the ship's
automation
I am an eye. I am a mechanical eye. I, a machine, I am showing you a world, the likes of which only I can see
I want to be a machine.
In the future, all robots will act like Don Knotts.
We're seeing the arrival of conversational robots that can walk in our world. It's a golden age of invention.
Corporations turned the human into a robot a long time ago.
Almost everything is like a machine.
In the future, I'm sure there will be a lot more robots in every aspect of life. If you told people in 1985 that in 25 years they would have computers in their kitchen, it would have made no sense to them.
When I made 'Terminator 3,' I learned something about directing actors to behave like robots. And one of the key things I learned is that if an actor tries to play a robot, he or she risks playing it mechanically in a way that makes the performance uninteresting.
And that was all of it. The machine stretched out in an endless, dizzying series of loops and whirls and weird mechanisms, sprouting wires like tree
roots. It didn't look real to her. Neither did Myrnin, as he turned to her with a barely concealed red glow in his eyes.
Someday it'll all be done by machine. Information machines.
The architecture - the mind - is knitting together. It's sentience. Vague sentience. All these years of formulating machines that know something, while the secret is to create machines that don't know something.
I have problems with machines which aren't gestural.
The question is, you know, will someone accidentally build a robot that takes over from us? And that's sort of like this lone guy in the backyard, you know - 'I accidentally built a 747.' I don't think that's going to happen.
There are many machines throughout history that were built to do something better than a human can.
This whole notion that the robot has to declare nuclear war is one part of the discussion, but it may not be reality. Reality is, maybe it can empathize to a far greater degree than we can and experience a way wider range of emotions. So, why not have a robot that can do that?
If you ask the typical two- or three-year-old or a teenager what a robot is, they will think about a humanoid that does my homework for me or walks the dog. When I go and talk to kids and pull out the Roomba, it's not this big 'Wow!' moment.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the science of how to get machines to do the things they do in the movies.
Character robotics could plant the seed for robots that actually have empathy. So, if they achieve human level intelligence or, quite possibly, greater than human levels of intelligence, this could be the seeds of hope for our future.
Machines are the concealed wishes of actants which have tamed forces so effectively that they no longer look like forces
Robots of the world, you are ordered to exterminate the human race. Do not spare the men. Do not spare the women. Preserve only the factories, railroads, machines, mines, and raw materials. Destroy everything else. Then return to work. Work must not cease.
It's becoming increasingly clear that mechanized intelligence can solve a rapidly expanding repertoire of problems.
One cannot evolve from one's robothood until one realizes how totally one has been robotized.
Stop, people! Don't make me hurt you! What chance have you against one who can smash robots?
With the advent of computing, human invention crossed a threshold into a world different from everything that came before. The computer is the universal machine almost by definition, machine-of-all-trades, capable of accomplishing or simulating just about any task that can be logically defined.
Robots will neither be common nor very good in 2014, but they will be in existence.
We imagine "pure" cybernetic systems, but we can prove only that we know how to build fairly dysfunctional ones. We kid ourselves when we think we understand something, even a computer, merely because we can model or digitize it.
When I began designing machines I also began to think that these objects, which sit next to each other and around people, can influence not only physical conditions but also emotions. They can touch the nerves, the blood, the muscles, the eyes and the moods of people.
Anything that's living is a machine. I'm a machine; my children are machines. I can step back and see them as being a bag of skin full of biomolecules that are interacting according to some laws.
Man is the only 150 pound nonlinear servomechanism that can be wholly reproduced by unskilled labor.
Has a control system so perilously close to intelligence that a government agent must be on hand at all times, ready to destroy the machine if it slips over the threshold into consciousness.
If you'd call it a robot," muttered Arthur. "It's more a sort of electronic sulking machine.
No one lives like a robot. We all make choices from the moment we wake up in the morning.
When a machine can do something better and faster than a person can, I am happy to let the machine do it.