Discover the most popular and inspiring quotes and sayings on the topic of Sequel. Share them with your friends on social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or your personal blogs, and let the world be inspired by their powerful messages. Here are the Top 100 Sequel Quotes And Sayings by 89 Authors including Thomas Bangalter,John Scalzi,Michael Lehmann,Jason Blum,Sarah Dessen for you to enjoy and share.
In 'Scream 2', they have this discussion about how sequels always suck.
To everyone who thinks writing a sequel should be easy because you've already clreated the universe: Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha! Heh. No.
I don't like sequels at all. If the movie's good the first time, why bother?
There are a lot of parallels between doing a sequel and doing low budget movies, which is they give creative parameters. As a creative person myself, I work better with parameters as opposed to anything goes.
My experience is that sequels are rarely as good as the originals.
I'm like the king of the low-budget sequel. People ask, 'What film are you gonna do next?' 'I don't know, but it's probably got a 3 or 4 in the title.'
Even if it's a sequel, lots of people have to give their all to make a game, but some people think the sequel process happens naturally.
People will turn their noses up at a sequel or that type of thing, but Pixar really works hard - if they're making a sequel - to make a sequel an original movie, to make it an original story.
The trick with sequels is, you have to give people what they liked before, yet be innovative enough so they don't feel like they're seeing the same movie.
I'm not much on sequels; I'm not much on remakes for the most part. I don't really like or dislike them.
Still waiting for the sequel, The Little Engine That Sought Revenge: Part Deux.
We all know the dangers of sequels. Lightning doesn't strike twice in the same place too often, and I think you've got to move beyond it, go the extra mile and have the courage not to just repeat the first one.
I really enjoyed hearing the likesand dislikesof my readers at book clubs as well as meeting new fans at the book signing at The Bookworm in Omaha " he said. "The book clubs have overwhelmingly asked me to hurry up on writing the sequel.
I think sequels should be earned and we won't do it unless the script is better than the first one.
I never actually plan sequels. They demand to be done.
When I first did 'The Fast and the Furious', I didn't want there to be a sequel on the first one. I thought, 'Why would you rush to do a sequel - just because your first film is successful?'
When you're writing for a sequel and there's a movie that's been deemed sacred ground by the fanbase that's the predecessor, you cannot do anything to tread on that, so it's a bit trickier than just being able to sit down and write something.
CHAPTER XL A STRANGE INTERVIEW, WHICH IS A SEQUEL TO THE LAST CHAPTER
Sequels are very rarely a good idea, and in any case, the success of the book changed my relationship with the club in some ways.
Great success breeds a lot of things, including sequels.
Stories are better than fiction, so let's hope for some real-life sequels.
You might have been able to fool people the first time, or something, but you really can't make a successful sequel today unless people really, really liked the predecessor.
Life is a great novel, discovering your calling is the far better sequel
One hopeful sign that the filmmakers can learn and grow is that the sequel does not contain a single pie, if you know what I mean.
I'm always the last person they go to with a sequel, because I'm the most skeptical. You know, I'm very proud of what we've done, and I don't want to screw up our series.
I'm not big on sequels; I've done them, but I like doing little things that have their own timelessness to them, classic type things, and then you go onto something new.
I'm not contractually obligated to sequels on anything.
The reason why people don't get called back to sequels is because they did badly in the original [movie].
I did not want to write one of those sequels that famous first-book authors get into where everybody says, 'Oh yeah.'
The only reason ever to make a sequel is to spend more time with the characters that people love: to tell more of their story.
I never thought about doing a sequel when I was actually writing 'The Magicians.' I only ever considered it a standalone.
After 'Pitch Perfect,' I only want to be in sequels. No. 2 of whatever.
My gut feeling about sequels is that they should be premeditated: You should try to write a trilogy first or at least sketch out a trilogy if you have any faith in your film.
Revenge of the Middle-Aged Woman.
'Evil Dead 1' was never supposed to have a sequel.
I don't write any kind of sequel or remake.
Were I not married to the director, I'm not sure I'd know anything about the 'Underworld' sequel.
I'm not looking for sequels, but when something comes to you, and you're already a fan of that world, you have the desire to do it your way.
I was very fortunate that my first novel captivated the imaginations of so many readers who asked for a sequel. After that, one book led to another as I discovered other facets to my characters I wanted to investigate further.
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE
That's the hardest thing about doing sequels - you've lost the element of surprise.
For me, as an actor, the most challenging thing is creating the character in the beginning because you have to write their backstory. The easy part about doing a sequel is that you've done the film, so you already know their backstory.
A lot of people ask for sequels, but what they really want is just to know the characters are happy and safe.
12 Years a Slave
'Baby Boy' is one of my favourite films, and Tyrese keeps telling everybody we're going to make a sequel. I mean, we have a story right now but we don't know where we're going to take it.
There's nothing wrong with doing sequels, they're just easier to sell.
And I'm not anti-sequel, but I just feel like there are very few ideas that are meant to be continued.
In an industry afflicted by sequelitis, it has taken John Boorman almost three decades to make the sequel to his much-cherished Hope and Glory, but Queen and Country turns out to be well worth the wait.
I feel the way I always do about sequels. If there's an idea that excites me enough, and it feels like a way to do something new and fresh, then great. But I don't ever want to do a sequel just for the sake of doing a sequel.
PROLOGUE CHAPTER
'Would I mind if someone wrote a sequel to one of my books?' I asked myself, and I decided that I wouldn't, providing that the writer was respectful, had read my book first, and wasn't drunk when doing it.
Why not dream your own wonderful sequels? When you have finished a book, it can go on in your mind, the characters doing just what you want them to do.
I've never seen 'Evil Dead 2.' Sorry about that. I'm sorry to the world.
Audiences can be leery of sequels; the studios make a hit, they see dollar signs, and they make a cheap rip-off.
When you're an actress, there are only a few times you can really get paid. One of them is doing a sequel. They can't fake you or hire another actor to play you.
I mean, frankly, I'm not speaking as a representative of Disney or Pixar, I'm speaking as just myself as a filmmaker: I don't go into anything that often thinking about a sequel.
I was concerned about doing a sequel and repeating myself. That was before I read the script.
Summer movie idea: take all the sequels that are out right now, and make movies about their backstories.
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
I've always made sequels, even when I was making Super 8 movies if the audience liked it.
If you think about it, a lot of great horror films have bad sequels just because the market demands you to make the other one right away. Thank God no one in the 'Evil Dead' family thinks that way.
I cannot explain why they made that sequel to Secret of NIMH. Because they claim that it the original didn't make money, so what was the enthusiasm to make a sequel?
I don't know about doing a sequel. I think you can retroactively damage a product by adding to it.
Is this a movie?' I heard someone ask.
Naw- this is too original for Hollywood. They do sequels.
I think there are some people that are capable of making a sequel more special than the original. And we have seen that when the original Terminator came out, then Jim Cameron outdid himself with the sequel. Then it became the highest grossing movie of the year when it came out in 1991.
I think I've done a lot of movies that people would like to have seen a sequel to. But I grew up in a time when we didn't do sequels. You just did a movie because you wanted to do a movie and you wanted to tell a story. It wasn't to build a franchise.
The first sequel thing I wrote was this 'Forever Dawn' thing that will never get out, because it's horrid. But it's a really good outline for 'Breaking Dawn' - it's very similar. I knew what I was doing, which is good, because I think if I hadn't, there might have been a lot of pressure.
A movie as specific as 'Heathers,' which took place in a specific time and specific place and in which many of the characters got killed off, I never thought it made sense to see a sequel.
Misunderstood twins run away from weddings. Malevolent twins shoot the groom.
I think a lot of people end up making sequels to movies just because the first one did a lot of business, and I think what people have learned is that it doesn't matter if the first one did a lot of business or that people want to go see another one just to see another one.
The time has mainly gone on getting Inform into a decent shape for public use. I suppose the plot of 'Curses' makes a sequel conceivable when compared with, say, the plot of 'Hamlet' but none is planned.
Book the Second - the Golden Thread I. Five Years Later II. A Sight III. A Disappointment IV.
The bookseller said it's in two parts, and this is the first. I thought that next year, if we keep saving, we can get the second -
I didn't think one day something would happen that would bring me back to Wall Street to write what is essentially a sequel.
A lot of people have trouble with their second novel - the dreaded sophomore jinx. I wrote three books in between the two novels, and they just weren't very good.
Early in my career, I decided not to do sequels. I know that children enjoy them, but I valued the feeling that this was the only time I would write about these characters. I felt it gave me an added incentive to do my best by them, to tell readers everything I knew, to hold nothing back.
I do think that at a certain point, the reboot sequel mode has to give way to original ideas and back to a place where, you know, films are, you know, a medium and the cinema is a place you go to see something that is, you know, wholly new.
inside out, with all the Sturm und
Birth of a Nation
If I had done a sequel to 'Day of the Tentacle,' there probably wouldn't have been a 'Full Throttle.' If I did a 'Full Throttle' sequel, there wouldn't have been a 'Grim Fandango.' It's important to make new stuff up.
I'm pretty skeptical about Hollywood and its fascination with the sequel and the franchise.
I like to leave a film open-ended, with a lingering feeling. I'll not do sequels of any of my films till I have subjects to explore.
In some ways, you get to find your voice better in [a sequel] because you have to define how you're doing it differently.
THE UNBREAKABLE VOW
I suppose sequels are inevitable for a writer of a certain age.
When you do films that have multiple sequels, you develop a character for a film.
Most people know me at Pixar as the guy that doesn't like to do sequels or very reluctant to do sequels.
At Pixar, we do sequels only when we come up with a great idea, and we always strive to be different than the original.
Second movies are great because you can drop into them, and it doesn't really have a beginning on it, particularly in a traditional way. You can just tear into it.
'Troll 2' is one of the rare sequels where you don't have to waste time watching the first one, since the films have absolutely nothing to do with one another.
When people write fan-fic sequels to one of your books, it gives you a very strange feeling. It is very flattering but strange, as if the characters have come to life again without you knowing.
Chapter I AN UNEXPECTED PARTY
There would be no sequel to the sadness
I don't know if I would do sequels. I almost feel like when I'm done with them, they're going to have to find their own way.
Ohh! Wow!! Ohh!! Wow!! Those the only two words you know? Sounds like a dirty movie.
The first is that instead of writing a sequel, which is what most people do, this is in fact a prequel. Although we didn't know that when we began the process.
The original 'Hobbit' was never intended to have a sequel - Bilbo 'remained very happy to the end of his days and those were extraordinarily long': a sentence I find an almost insuperable obstacle to a satisfactory link.
Book 3: Fatal Consequences
Clearly any film company that makes a film is always going to talk about sequels particularly if they see something as being successful, which Werewolf was.
Like a lot of people, for a long time I thought that the road to hell is paved with bad sequels.