Discover the most popular and inspiring quotes and sayings on the topic of Subversion. Share them with your friends on social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or your personal blogs, and let the world be inspired by their powerful messages. Here are the Top 100 Subversion Quotes And Sayings by 81 Authors including Bruce Perens,Alan Kay,Simon Phipps,Steve Jobs,Russell Jurney for you to enjoy and share.
But the most reliable indication of the future of Open Source is its past: in just a few years, we have gone from nothing to a robust body of software that solves many different problems and is reaching the million-user count. There's no reason for us to slow down now.
Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
An open source community arises from the synchronization of the individual interests of many parties.
When we started off we didn't know how to spell software.
Building and maintaining consensus while collaborating is the hardest part of building software.
I want people to use Perl. I want to be a positive ingredient of the world and make my American history. So, whatever it takes to give away my software and get it used, that's great.
There is this thing called the GPL (Gnu Public Licence), which we disagree with ... nobody can ever improve the software.
We say submarining is a team sport, but in practice it often amounts to a bunch of individuals, each working in his own shell, rather than a rich collaboration.
Software is now so complex - requiring so many gazillions of tiny files all over your computer - that most consumers don't want to bother to know what's really going on.
would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code.
I think a lot of the basis of the open source movement comes from procrastinating students ...
The faster the commit suite is, the more often you can run it.
Software is like entropy. It is difficult to grasp, weighs nothing, and obeys the second law of thermodynamics; i.e. it always increases.
Software work is the most complex that humanity has ever undertaken.
Open source is a beautiful way of collaborating; but what's happening on the free Internet is more akin to the 'crowdsourcing' of journalists and other content creators by advertisers who no longer have to pay them - only the search engines that parse their articles.
A typical software project can present more opportunities to learn from mistakes than some people get in a lifetime.
Open source can propagate to fill all the nooks and crannies that people want it to fill.
Unix is simple and coherent, but it takes a genius (or at any rate, a programmer) to understand and appreciate the simplicity..
For the first time, individual hackers could afford to have home machines comparable in power and storage capacity to the minicomputers of ten years earlier - Unix engines capable of supporting a full development environment and talking to the Internet.
Software is becoming no different than a videotape or a record album or a paperback book, and not all of us are ready for that change.
Free open-source software, by its nature, is unlikely to feature secret back doors that lead directly to Langley, Va.
There are many examples of companies and countries that have improved their competitiveness and efficiency by adopting open source strategies. The creation of skills through all levels is of fundamental importance to both companies and countries.
In open-source in general, the power lies in connecting the author of the software directly to users, eliminating the middleman.
We have a very active testing community which people don't often think about when you have open source.
The free software community should be supported more widely. I'm totally in solidarity with what they do.
I don't like creating software anymore. It's too exact. It's like karate; there's no room for error.
If at first you don't succeed; call it version 1.0.
I got tired of people complaining that it was too hard to use UNIX because the editor was too complicated.
ultimately, open source depends on intrinsic motivation with the same ferocity that older business models rely on extrinsic motivation,
Software is usually expected to be modified over the course of its productive life. The process of converting one correct program into a different correct program is extremely challenging.
In true open source development, there's lots of visibility all the way through the development process.
Our civilization depends critically on software, and we have a dangerously low degree of professionalism in the computer fields
(Seriously, if I catch another person commenting out something instead of deleting it, I will write a whole book titled Why God Invented Source Control.)
Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer, I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business.
What I actually admire in Perl is its ability to provide a very successful abstraction of the horrible mess that is collectively called Unix.
If you want to build an open source project, you can't let your ego stand in the way. You can't rewrite everybody's patches, you can't second-guess everybody, and you have to give people equal control.
It is formatted, and I'm tired of using vi. I get really bored.
Life would be much easier if I had the source code.
Central tenets of the Hacker Ethic: the free flow of information, particularly information that helped fellow hackers understand, explore, and build systems.
Deep Throat is a guy who could have your files and mine in his trust.
There are better versions of me, Jeremy. It's not like with people. With people you can argue and have tests and music reviews and wars to decide who's better, but with software, it's pretty clear. I get evolved beyond my version number, and then I'm useless.
Governments are scared of software.
Forget UNIX - it will be gone in 5 years.
For many people my software is something that you install and forget. I like to keep it that way.
All this stuff was done via FTP but the web has put a really nice user interface on it.
The finest pieces of software are those where one individual has a complete sense of exactly how the program works. To have that, you have to really love the program and concentrate on keeping it simple, to an incredible degree.
We make versions, and true versions make worlds.
To call up a demon you must learn its name. Men dreamed that, once, but now it is real in another way. You know that, Case. Your business is to learn the names of programs, the long formal names, names the owners seek to conceal. True names . . .
The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected ...
The "question" is the original open-source code.
Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.
If you want to do interesting software, you have to have a bunch of people do it, because the amount of software that one person can do isn't that interesting.
I don't think I've ever seen a piece of commercial software where the next version is simpler rather than more complex.
It's time to re-appreciate the original software: paper.
I'm also a fan with sticking with the most standard software that millions of other users also use, because you get the benefit of all those other users' problems and solutions.
The structure of software systems tend to reflect the structure of the organization that produce them.
developer. Thank You, The Kindle
I'm a victim of Developaralysis: the crippling sense that the software industry is evolving so fast that no one person can possibly keep up.
I have this hope that there is a better way. Higher-level tools that actually let you see the structure of the software more clearly will be of tremendous value.
Shareware tends to combine the worst of commercial software with the worst of free software.
It gives you great pleasure to know that millions of developers, day to day, make their living using the software that you created.
Most software has a tiny essence that justifies its existence, everything after that is wants and desires mistaken for needs and necessities.
I believe good software is written by small teams of two, three, or four people interacting with each other at a very, high dense level.
If Unix could present the same face, the same capabilities, on machines of many different types, it could serve as a common software environment for all of them.
The computer programmer creates the only path available to the computer user; the effect of his decisions on others is masked by their abstraction.
Visual journals are created in a secret language of symbols. Intentional or not, they are private maps only their makers can follow.
I think open source is an evolutionary idea for humanity, this idea of transparency. It played out for us in the technology world, but it also played out with the idea of a truth and reconciliation commission and Wikipedia.
People enjoy the interaction on the Internet, and the feeling of belonging to a group that does something interesting: that's how some software projects are born.
You show me a great program and I'll show you a passionate individual somewhere behind it.
See, you not only have to be a good coder to create a system like Linux, you have to be a sneaky bastard too.
Business people love to hate their current software and love to love the next software they haven't yet bought. Salespeople count on this. But tomorrow's tools will become the current tools.
Bill Gates is a very rich man today ... and do you want to know why? The answer is one word: versions.
Software is usually accompanied by documentation in the form of big fat scary manuals that nobody ever reads. In fact, for the past five years most of the manuals shipped with software products have actually been copies of Stephen King's The Stand with new covers pasted on.
There is a special room in Hell for file organization quality control.
In real open source, you have the right to control your own destiny.
I think a lot of great software has been written by people who are scratching a short-term itch, something which has been niggling them for ages, but in the back of their mind they've got a wonderful long-term plan.
I define UNIX as 30 definitions of regular expressions living under one roof.
Unix gives you just enough rope to hang yourself - and then a couple of more feet, just to be sure.
The second stream of material that is going to come out of this project is a programming environment and a set of programming tools where we really want to focus again on the needs of the newbie. This environment is going to have to be extremely user-friendly.
We support about 5,000 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) with software, training, and technical support. We provide our software at virtually no cost to them, and they're lighting up the world with what they do.
When done well, software is invisible.
To create a usable piece of software, you have to fight for every fix, every feature, every little accommodation that will get one more person up the curve. There are no shortcuts. Luck is involved, but you don't win by being lucky, it happens because you fought for every inch.
You can't take a dying project, sprinkle it with the magic pixie dust of "open source," and have everything magically work out.
Lisp ... made me aware that software could be close to executable mathematics.
The NSA and Israel wrote Stuxnet together.
Software production is like any other production the preceded it, no raw materials are required, no time is required and no effort is required, you can make a million Copies of Software instantaneously for free and its very unique about that.
You can measure a programmer's perspective by noting his attitude on the continuing vitality of FORTRAN.
I would love to see all open-source innovation happen on top of Windows.
The free sharing and teaching of open source is incompatible with the notion of the solitary genius.
It seems like the web, particularly software as a service, provides ample opportunities for you to flourish economically, completely aligned with the broader open source community.
Unix is not so much an operating system as an oral history.
Well, software doesn't quite work that way. Rather than construction, software is more like gardening - it is more organic than concrete. You plant many things in a garden according to an initial plan and conditions. Some thrive, others are destined to end up as compost.
OLD FRIENDS. Fcp. 8vo. 2s. 6d. net.
Linux provides programmers with everything they need: libraries, compilers, and debugging/development tools. These features are included in all standard Linux versions.
I realized in 1988 that my life as a spy specializing in secrets was not only unproductive, it was in sharp opposition to what we actually need: full access to true information, and consequently, the ability to create Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT).
Software development is technical activity conducted by human beings.
Software is a great combination between artistry and engineering.
Oh, I've seen copies [of Linux Journal] around the terminal room at The
Labs.
Software is a tangle, a knot, which ties together the physical and the ephemeral, the material and the ethereal, into a multi-linear ensemble that can be controlled and directed.
If in my lifetime the problem of non-free software is solved, I could perhaps relax and write software again. But I might instead try to help deal with the world's larger problems. Standing up to an evil system is exhilarating, and now I have a taste for it.